SOUTH WALES POLICE · view source
Jamie Rawson
Age 56 · Swansea, South Wales
Case and court outcome
- Plea
- Not guilty to all offences
- Verdict
- Jury convictions for rape, false imprisonment, assault occasioning actual bodily harm and intentional strangulation
- Sentence type
- Immediate custody
- Extended licence
- Five-year extension
Offence details
- Offence period
- 8 February 2025
- Offence start date
- February 8, 2025
Verified case summary
What happened
Jamie Rawson, 56, from Swansea city centre, carried out an extended attack against a woman on 8 February 2025.
South Wales Police said Rawson had met the woman for the first time that evening.
The conduct later put before the court included rape, false imprisonment, assault occasioning actual bodily harm and intentional strangulation.
The official report records that the victim sustained serious injuries and supported the police investigation and subsequent prosecution.
Investigation and verdicts
Rawson denied all of the offences.
The case therefore proceeded to trial, where a jury considered the evidence.
He was found guilty of one count of rape, one count of false imprisonment, one count of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and one count of intentional strangulation.
South Wales Police said the survivor's evidence was central to securing the four convictions.
The investigating officer also stated that Rawson showed no remorse during the trial.
Extended sentence
The court imposed a 12-year prison term and a further five-year extension, producing a total extended sentence of 17 years.
The South Wales Police report published on 24 July 2026 does not state the name of the court or the precise sentencing date, so those fields are deliberately omitted from this record.
The report describes the outcome as a measure intended to protect women and the wider public.
Police thanked the survivor for supporting both the investigation and trial, stating that her evidence enabled officers to secure the convictions.
This page distinguishes the immediate 12-year prison term from the five-year extension rather than presenting the full period as time necessarily spent in custody.